How to Multi-Thread Sales Deals: Complete Guide + 7 Frameworks (2025)
When you only have one contact in an account, you're one resignation, one internal veto, or one budget freeze away from losing the entire deal.
TL;DR: Multi-threading means building active relationships with three or more stakeholders in a target account to reduce single-point-of-failure risk and accelerate deals. Map the buying committee before your second meeting, ask for power by name after a strong demo, and use forwardable content through your champion to thread executives without burning relationships. Expect 20% faster cycle times and 15% higher win rates when you maintain weekly value touchpoints with each thread.
Key Takeaways:
- Deals with 3+ engaged stakeholders close 20% faster and have 15% higher win rates
- Every enterprise deal needs three types of contacts: Champion, Economic Buyer, and Technical Evaluator
- Map the buying committee before your second meeting using LinkedIn and discovery questions
- Ask for power by name after a successful demo using "their best interest" framing
- Use forwardable content—brief, visual, outcome-focused—that your champion can easily share
- Avoid going over your champion's head without permission or treating all stakeholders the same
- Maintain weekly value touchpoints with each active thread to prevent relationships from going cold
What is Multi-Threading in Sales?
Answer: Multi-threading is the practice of building and maintaining active relationships with multiple stakeholders across different levels and departments within a target account. Instead of relying on a single champion, you create a web of connections that support your deal from various angles—reducing risk and accelerating consensus.
In complex B2B sales, single-threading (relying on one contact) is the fastest path to deal failure. Your champion leaves the company. They get overruled in an internal meeting. They lose budget authority. Suddenly, months of work evaporate.
Multi-threading solves this by:
- Reducing single-point-of-failure risk: If one contact goes dark, you have others to advance the deal
- Building consensus across departments: Finance, IT, operations, and leadership all have a voice
- Accelerating deal velocity: Multiple stakeholders pushing internally moves deals faster than one lone advocate
- Gaining multiple perspectives: You understand the full buying process, not just one person's view
The data backs this up. Research shows that deals with three or more engaged stakeholders close 20% faster and have 15% higher win rates compared to single-threaded deals.
Why Multi-Threading Matters in 2025
Answer: Enterprise buying committees have grown from an average of 5.4 stakeholders in 2019 to 7+ in 2025, making multi-threading not just a best practice but a requirement for closing complex deals. Without active relationships across the buying committee, you'll lose to competitors who do the work to build consensus.
Here's what happens when you multi-thread effectively:
The Four Core Benefits
- Risk Mitigation: When your champion leaves or loses influence, you have backup relationships to keep the deal moving
- Faster Cycles: Multiple internal advocates pushing simultaneously reduces approval bottlenecks by 20%
- Higher Win Rates: Deals with 3+ engaged contacts win 15% more often because you've built consensus before the final decision
- Better Intelligence: Each stakeholder reveals different priorities, objections, and political dynamics you'd miss with single-threading
What the Data Shows
| Metric | Single-Threaded Deals | Multi-Threaded Deals (3+) | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average cycle time | 120 days | 96 days | 20% faster |
| Win rate | 22% | 37% | +15 pts |
| Deal size | $85K | $110K | 29% larger |
| Risk of stall/loss | 58% | 31% | -27 pts |
The bottom line: In 2025, multi-threading is not optional—it's table stakes for enterprise sales.
The Three Types of Contacts Every Deal Needs
Answer: Every enterprise deal requires three core contact types to close successfully: a Champion (your internal advocate), an Economic Buyer (budget authority and final decision-maker), and a Technical Evaluator (the person assessing fit and requirements). Missing any one of these creates a critical gap that can stall or kill your deal.
Contact Type 1: The Champion
Who they are: Your internal advocate who believes in your solution and actively sells on your behalf when you're not in the room.
What they do:
- Provide insider intelligence on buying process, politics, and priorities
- Forward your content to other stakeholders
- Coach you on how to position your solution internally
- Navigate you through approval processes
How to identify them: They proactively share information, respond quickly, and ask questions about implementation (not just evaluation).
Red flag: If your "champion" won't introduce you to their boss or other stakeholders, they're not actually a champion—they're just a friendly contact.
Contact Type 2: The Economic Buyer
Who they are: The person with budget authority and final sign-off power. Usually VP-level or C-suite.
What they do:
- Make the final yes/no decision
- Allocate budget and resources
- Prioritize initiatives across competing projects
- Sign the contract
How to identify them: Ask your champion directly: "Who has final budget authority for this?" or "Whose signature do we need on the contract?"
Common titles: VP of Sales, CRO, VP of Operations, CFO (for large deals), CEO (for SMB or strategic enterprise deals)
Contact Type 3: The Technical Evaluator
Who they are: The person responsible for assessing whether your solution meets technical, security, and operational requirements.
What they do:
- Define evaluation criteria
- Test your product or review technical documentation
- Assess integration requirements and security compliance
- Provide technical recommendation to Economic Buyer
How to identify them: Often IT, RevOps, Sales Operations, or a senior IC with deep domain expertise.
Why they matter: Even if the Economic Buyer loves you, a "no" from the Technical Evaluator can kill the deal. Engage them early.
How Do I Start Multi-Threading an Account Effectively?
Answer: Start by mapping the buying committee before your second meeting, then ask for power by name after a successful demo using "their best interest" framing. Use forwardable content written through your champion to pull in executives without going over anyone's head, and maintain weekly value touchpoints with each active thread to ensure no relationship goes cold.
Framework 1: The Pre-Meeting Two Buying Committee Map
What it is: A research and discovery process to identify all key stakeholders before your second customer interaction.
When to use: Between your first discovery call and second meeting (demo, deeper dive, or follow-up).
How to use:
-
LinkedIn Research (15 minutes):
- Search the company on LinkedIn
- Identify VP and C-level contacts in relevant departments (Sales, Operations, IT, Finance)
- Note who your champion reports to (likely the Economic Buyer)
- Find the Technical Evaluator (often RevOps, Sales Ops, or IT)
-
Discovery Questions (during first call):
- "Who else typically gets involved in decisions like this at your company?"
- "Walk me through your buying process—who needs to weigh in?"
- "Who has final budget authority for this initiative?"
- "Is there a technical or security review process we should plan for?"
-
Create Your Stakeholder Map:
- List all identified contacts with roles and influence level
- Mark which ones you have access to vs. need introductions
- Note each person's likely priorities and concerns
Example stakeholder map:
| Name | Role | Type | Access | Priority/Concern |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah | AE Manager | Champion | Direct | Needs faster onboarding |
| Michael | VP Sales | Economic Buyer | Via Sarah | Wants 10%+ quota attainment lift |
| Priya | RevOps Lead | Technical Evaluator | Via Sarah | CRM integration & data security |
| James | AE (team lead) | Influencer | Direct | Worried about change management |
Why it works: You're proactively identifying gaps before they become deal-killers. Most reps wait until late-stage to realize they've never spoken to the Economic Buyer—by then, it's too late.
Framework 2: The "Their Best Interest" Power Ask
What it is: A framing technique to ask your champion for an introduction to the Economic Buyer (or other stakeholders) by positioning it as beneficial to them, not just you.
When to use: After a successful demo or deep-dive meeting where you've delivered clear value and your champion is engaged.
How to use:
Step 1: Foreshadow early During discovery or demo, plant the seed:
- "Based on what you've shared, decisions like this typically need [VP/CRO] input. Does that sound right?"
Step 2: Ask directly after delivering value Immediately following a strong demo or value moment:
- "Sarah, I want to make sure this moves forward smoothly and doesn't stall. Based on what you've told me, these decisions usually need Michael's [VP Sales] input. Could we loop him in for a brief conversation? I can send you something to forward, or we could set up a quick 15-minute call—whatever works best."
Step 3: Frame as their benefit
- "I've seen deals like this stall when the exec team isn't involved early. I don't want that to happen to you."
- "Getting Michael's perspective now will help us tailor everything to what matters most to leadership."
Talk track template:
"[Champion name], based on what you've shared about [specific pain/goal], I want to make sure this moves forward without hitting roadblocks. In my experience, decisions like this need [Economic Buyer title]'s input to get approved quickly. Could we bring [their name] into the conversation? I can send you a brief summary to forward, or we can schedule a 15-minute call—whatever's easiest for you."
Why it works: You're not asking for the introduction to benefit yourself—you're framing it as protecting your champion from internal deal friction. This removes the awkwardness and positions you as a strategic partner.
Framework 3: The Forwardable Executive Brief
What it is: A short, visual, outcome-focused email or document your champion can forward to executives without editing.
When to use: After you've asked for an introduction to the Economic Buyer or other stakeholders. Send this to your champion to make it effortless for them to loop others in.
How to use:
Structure (max 200 words):
-
Subject line: "[Champion name] asked me to share: [Specific outcome] for [Company]"
- Example: "Sarah asked me to share: 10-15% faster onboarding for Acme's sales team"
-
Opening (1 sentence): State the business outcome
- "We've been exploring how to reduce Acme's sales onboarding time from 90 days to 60-75 days while improving quota attainment."
-
The Plan (3 bullets): How you'll achieve it
- Specific, outcome-focused, no jargon
- "Automate multi-threading playbooks so new AEs engage 3+ stakeholders per account in week one"
- "AI-assisted email workflows reduce time spent on outreach by 40%"
- "Real-time coaching on relationship-building strategies through Slack"
-
Proof Point (1 sentence): Social proof
- "Similar-sized sales teams have seen 12-18% faster ramp times and 8% higher first-year quota attainment."
-
Next Step (1 sentence): Low-friction ask
- "Happy to walk through a 15-minute overview tailored to your priorities—does next Tuesday or Wednesday work?"
Example forwardable brief:
Subject: Sarah asked me to share: 15% faster onboarding for Acme's sales team
Hi Michael,
Sarah and I have been exploring how to reduce Acme's sales onboarding time from 90 days to 60-75 days while improving quota attainment for new AEs.
Here's the plan:
- Automate multi-threading playbooks so new AEs engage 3+ stakeholders per account in week one
- AI-assisted email workflows reduce time spent on outreach by 40%
- Real-time coaching on relationship-building strategies through Slack
Similar-sized sales teams have seen 12-18% faster ramp times and 8% higher first-year quota attainment.
Happy to walk through a 15-minute overview tailored to your priorities—does next Tuesday or Wednesday work?
Best, [Your name]
Why it works: Your champion doesn't have to write anything or translate your message. They just hit forward. The brief is executive-friendly (short, outcome-focused, no fluff) and makes your champion look good for bringing you a solution.
Framework 4: The Value Touchpoint Cadence
What it is: A systematic approach to maintaining relationships with each thread through regular, value-driven touchpoints (not just check-ins).
When to use: Once you've established contact with multiple stakeholders. Use this to keep threads warm throughout the sales cycle.
How to use:
Weekly Value Touchpoint Formula:
- Frequency: Once per week per active thread (don't let more than 7 days pass)
- Format: Email, LinkedIn message, or Slack (match their preferred channel)
- Length: 50-100 words max
- Content: Always include value (not "just checking in")
Five types of value touchpoints:
-
Relevant Industry Insight:
- "Saw this benchmark report on sales onboarding—thought the data on multi-threading (page 7) would be relevant to our conversation."
-
Customer Story/Case Study:
- "Just wrapped a call with a VP Sales at [similar company]—they solved the exact champion-dependency problem you mentioned. Want me to intro you?"
-
Tactical Resource:
- "Built a quick ROI calculator based on your team size and current onboarding time. Shows potential $240K savings. Want me to send it over?"
-
Answer to Unasked Question:
- "You mentioned security review—here's our SOC 2 documentation and a one-pager on our data handling. Should save Priya some time."
-
Internal Win/Update:
- "Quick update: Sarah's team tested the forwardable email templates—80% engagement rate from executives. Thought you'd want to see the early signal."
Cadence by stakeholder type:
| Stakeholder Type | Touchpoint Frequency | Content Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Champion | 2x per week | Tactical execution, internal intelligence, next steps |
| Economic Buyer | 1x per week | Business outcomes, ROI, strategic alignment |
| Technical Evaluator | 1x per week | Technical docs, integration details, security compliance |
| Influencers | 1x every 10 days | Role-specific value, peer stories, quick wins |
Why it works: You're staying top-of-mind without being annoying. Each touchpoint delivers value, so stakeholders welcome your messages instead of ignoring them. This prevents threads from going cold and keeps your deal moving.
Framework 5: The Stakeholder-Specific Value Prop
What it is: Tailoring your messaging and positioning to each stakeholder's unique priorities, concerns, and success metrics—not using the same pitch for everyone.
When to use: Every interaction with every stakeholder. Never use generic messaging.
How to use:
Step 1: Identify each stakeholder's core priority
Use this stakeholder priority map:
| Stakeholder Type | Core Priority | Key Metric | Common Objection |
|---|---|---|---|
| Champion (AE/Manager) | Hit quota, reduce busy work | Personal quota attainment, time saved | "Will this add more work to my plate?" |
| Economic Buyer (VP/CRO) | Revenue growth, team efficiency | Team quota attainment, win rate, cycle time | "What's the ROI and when do we see it?" |
| Technical Evaluator (RevOps/IT) | System reliability, data security | Integration success, uptime, data accuracy | "Will this break our existing stack?" |
| Influencer (Senior AE/Team Lead) | Ease of adoption, credibility | Peer validation, learning curve | "Is this another tool that won't get used?" |
Step 2: Customize your message
For each stakeholder, lead with THEIR priority:
Champion (AE Manager):
- ❌ Generic: "Our platform helps sales teams close more deals."
- ✅ Tailored: "You mentioned spending 10 hours a week on manual outreach. Our AI-assisted workflows cut that to 2-3 hours while engaging 3x more stakeholders per account—so you're hitting quota without working weekends."
Economic Buyer (VP Sales):
- ❌ Generic: "We have great features for multi-threading."
- ✅ Tailored: "Your team's current 22% win rate and 120-day cycle time cost you $2.4M in lost revenue annually. Multi-threading with our platform gets you to 28% win rate and 95-day cycles—that's $800K in recovered revenue in year one."
Technical Evaluator (RevOps):
- ❌ Generic: "Our tool integrates with your CRM."
- ✅ Tailored: "Your Salesforce instance is already complex. Our integration is read-only for stakeholder data, writes engagement activity automatically, and requires zero custom fields. We'll have you live in 48 hours without touching your existing workflows."
Step 3: Validate your assumptions
Before your first meeting with each stakeholder, confirm their priority:
- "Michael, Sarah mentioned your top priority is improving team quota attainment—is that still the main focus, or has anything shifted?"
Why it works: Generic pitches get ignored. When you speak directly to someone's specific priority in their language, they pay attention. This differentiation is what separates top performers from average AEs.
What Are the Most Common Multi-Threading Mistakes to Avoid?
Answer: The four most common multi-threading mistakes are going over your champion's head without permission, treating all stakeholders the same, waiting too long to expand beyond your initial contact, and failing to maintain relationships after the initial introduction. Each of these can damage trust and stall your deal.
Mistake 1: Going Over Your Champion's Head
What it looks like: Reaching out directly to the Economic Buyer or other executives without your champion's knowledge or approval.
Why it's deadly: You burn your champion relationship, create internal political tension, and signal that you don't respect organizational dynamics.
How to avoid it:
- Always ask permission: "Would it make sense for me to reach out directly to Michael, or would you prefer to make the introduction?"
- Use forwardable content so your champion controls the introduction
- If you must go direct (rare), give your champion a heads-up first: "Hey Sarah, I'm going to send a brief note to Michael—wanted you to know. Happy to share the draft if helpful."
Exception: If your champion has gone completely dark for 2+ weeks and the deal is at risk, a carefully worded message to the Economic Buyer may be necessary—but acknowledge the situation directly.
Mistake 2: Treating All Stakeholders the Same
What it looks like: Sending the same pitch deck, using the same talk track, and focusing on the same features with every contact.
Why it's deadly: A VP Sales doesn't care about technical integration details. A RevOps lead doesn't care about your customer logos. Generic messaging signals you haven't done your homework.
How to avoid it:
- Use Framework 5 (Stakeholder-Specific Value Prop) to customize every interaction
- Research each stakeholder's background, priorities, and likely concerns before meeting
- Ask tailored questions: "As RevOps, what's your biggest concern when evaluating new tools?"
Pro tip: Keep a stakeholder-specific notes doc with each person's priorities, objections, and preferred communication style. Review it before every interaction.
Mistake 3: Waiting Too Long to Multi-Thread
What it looks like: Spending weeks or months with your champion, then scrambling to reach the Economic Buyer in the final stages when budget approval is needed.
Why it's deadly: Late-stage introductions to power feel transactional. The Economic Buyer hasn't built trust with you, doesn't understand the value, and is more likely to say "not now" or demand a discount.
How to avoid it:
- Map the buying committee before meeting two (Framework 1)
- Ask for power after your demo (Framework 2), not in the final week
- Foreshadow executive involvement early: "Typically decisions like this need your VP's input—does that sound right?"
Timeline rule: If your average sales cycle is 90 days, you should have contact with the Economic Buyer by day 30. If it's 180 days, by day 60.
Mistake 4: Forgetting to Maintain Relationships After Introduction
What it looks like: Getting introduced to the Economic Buyer or Technical Evaluator, having one meeting, then going silent for weeks while you focus on your champion.
Why it's deadly: Relationships atrophy. The Economic Buyer forgets about you. When it's time for final approval, they don't remember why this deal matters, and your champion has to re-sell internally.
How to avoid it:
- Use Framework 4 (Value Touchpoint Cadence) to maintain weekly contact with each thread
- Set reminders in your CRM: "Touch base with Michael (VP Sales) with ROI update"
- Share progress updates: "Quick win—Sarah's team tested the playbook and saw 80% exec engagement. Thought you'd want to see the early results."
Rule of thumb: No thread should go more than 7 days without a value touchpoint. If you can't think of value to provide, you haven't researched their priorities deeply enough.
How Does Yess.ai Help with Multi-Threading?
Answer: Yess.ai is a multi-threading and relationship selling platform that identifies all stakeholders (external and internal) needed in each deal, pinpoints the exact right time to involve them, and executes AI-assisted outreach with one-click approval workflows via Slack and email—so you don't just get recommendations on who to contact, but how, when, and automated execution on your behalf.
The Three Ways Yess.ai Accelerates Multi-Threading
1. Automatic Stakeholder Mapping
- Yess.ai analyzes your target accounts and identifies Champions, Economic Buyers, Technical Evaluators, and Influencers automatically
- No more manual LinkedIn research or guessing who matters
- Get a complete buying committee map before your second meeting
2. AI-Assisted, Contextual Outreach
- Generate stakeholder-specific emails tailored to each person's role, priorities, and your deal context
- Create forwardable executive briefs in seconds (Framework 3)
- Get talk tracks for asking for power (Framework 2)
- One-click approval workflow via Slack—review and send without leaving your workspace
3. Relationship Health Tracking
- See which threads are active, warm, or going cold
- Get alerts when a stakeholder hasn't been contacted in 7+ days
- Track engagement across all threads to ensure no relationship atrophies
Yess.ai doesn't replace your selling—it handles the execution work (research, drafting, tracking) so you can focus on building relationships and closing deals.
Learn more: Book a demo to see how Yess.ai helps sales teams multi-thread accounts and close 20% faster.
Multi-Threading Action Plan: Your Next 30 Days
Answer: Start multi-threading effectively in the next 30 days by mapping your current pipeline for single-threaded risk, implementing the Pre-Meeting Two Buying Committee Map on your next three deals, and practicing the "Their Best Interest" Power Ask after your next successful demo.
Week 1: Audit Your Current Pipeline
Day 1-2: Identify single-threaded risk
- Review every open opportunity in your CRM
- Mark which deals have only one active contact
- Prioritize the highest-value single-threaded deals for immediate action
Day 3-5: Map buying committees for top 3 deals
- Use Framework 1 (Pre-Meeting Two Buying Committee Map) on your three largest opportunities
- Research on LinkedIn, identify Economic Buyers and Technical Evaluators
- Create stakeholder maps for each deal
Week 2: Execute First Power Asks
Day 8-10: Prepare forwardable briefs
- Write forwardable executive briefs (Framework 3) for your top 3 deals
- Tailor each brief to the specific Economic Buyer's priorities
- Get feedback from a manager or peer
Day 11-14: Ask for power
- Use Framework 2 ("Their Best Interest" Power Ask) with your champions
- Send the forwardable briefs
- Track response rates and introductions gained
Week 3: Establish Value Touchpoint Cadences
Day 15-17: Set up tracking system
- Create a simple spreadsheet or CRM view with all stakeholders across all deals
- Add columns for: Last Contact Date, Next Touchpoint Due, Touchpoint Type
- Set weekly reminders
Day 18-21: Execute first value touchpoints
- Send value touchpoints (Framework 4) to every stakeholder you've been introduced to
- Track engagement and responses
- Refine your approach based on what resonates
Week 4: Measure and Optimize
Day 22-25: Analyze results
- How many new stakeholder relationships did you establish?
- Which frameworks worked best?
- Where did you face resistance or challenges?
Day 26-30: Systematize your approach
- Turn the frameworks that worked into templates in your CRM or email
- Share successful talk tracks with your team
- Commit to using Framework 1 (buying committee mapping) on every new deal going forward
Success metrics to track:
- Number of deals with 3+ active stakeholders (target: 80%+ of pipeline)
- Average days to first Economic Buyer contact (target: <30 days into sales cycle)
- Percentage of deals where you've met the Technical Evaluator before final stages (target: 90%+)
- Win rate improvement (expect 3-7 percentage point lift within 90 days)
- Cycle time improvement (expect 10-20% reduction within 90 days)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What if my champion refuses to introduce me to the Economic Buyer?
This is a red flag that they're not actually a champion—they may lack influence, fear being bypassed, or doubt your solution. Try reframing the ask using the "their best interest" approach (Framework 2): "I don't want this to stall when it gets to [exec]. What's the best way to get their input early?" If they still refuse, you may need to find a different champion or accept this deal has low win probability.
How many stakeholders should I aim to engage per deal?
Minimum three: Champion, Economic Buyer, and Technical Evaluator. For enterprise deals over $100K, aim for 5-7 stakeholders across different departments and levels. Research shows engagement with 6+ stakeholders correlates with 30%+ higher win rates in complex sales.
When is it too early to multi-thread?
It's almost never too early. Map the buying committee before your second meeting (Framework 1). Ask for power after a successful demo. The most common mistake is waiting too long, not starting too early. Exception: Don't ask for executive introductions before you've delivered clear value to your champion.
What if I accidentally go over my champion's head?
Acknowledge it immediately and transparently: "Hey Sarah, I realized I reached out to Michael before looping you in—that wasn't the right approach. I should have asked you first. How would you like me to handle executive communication going forward?" Honesty and humility can repair the relationship. Then, never do it again.
How do I maintain relationships with 5-7 stakeholders without it becoming a full-time job?
Use Framework 4 (Value Touchpoint Cadence) with a systematic approach. Weekly touchpoints take 5-10 minutes each if you're sharing relevant content, not writing custom essays. Batch your touchpoints: spend 30 minutes every Monday preparing value for all stakeholders across all deals. Tools like Yess.ai can automate much of this research and drafting work.
Should I use the same talk track with every stakeholder?
No. Use Framework 5 (Stakeholder-Specific Value Prop) to customize your messaging. Champions care about ease and personal quota attainment. Economic Buyers care about ROI and strategic alignment. Technical Evaluators care about integration and security. Generic pitches fail.
What if my deal is moving fast and I don't have time to multi-thread?
Fast-moving deals often stall suddenly when they hit an unexpected stakeholder who wasn't engaged early. If a deal is moving fast, that's actually a sign you need to multi-thread immediately—ask your champion: "This is moving quickly, which is great. Who else needs to be involved to make sure it doesn't hit a roadblock at the end?" Deals that close in 30 days still need Economic Buyer involvement.
Conclusion: Multi-Threading is Non-Negotiable in 2025
Single-threading is the fastest way to lose deals in enterprise sales. When you rely on one contact, you're one resignation, one internal veto, or one budget freeze away from months of wasted work.
Multi-threading—building active relationships with three or more stakeholders—reduces risk, accelerates consensus, and increases win rates by 15% while cutting cycle times by 20%.
The five frameworks in this guide give you everything you need to start:
- Map buying committees before meeting two so you know who matters early
- Ask for power after strong demos using "their best interest" framing
- Use forwardable content to make it effortless for champions to introduce you
- Maintain weekly value touchpoints so no thread goes cold
- Customize messaging by stakeholder so every interaction resonates
Start with your top three deals this week. Map the buying committees. Ask for one Economic Buyer introduction. Send one forwardable brief.
Your win rates will thank you.
Ready to Multi-Thread at Scale?
Yess.ai helps B2B sales teams identify all stakeholders, pinpoint the right time to engage them, and execute AI-assisted outreach with one-click approval workflows.
What you get:
- Automatic buying committee mapping for every account
- AI-generated, stakeholder-specific outreach (review and approve via Slack)
- Relationship health tracking so no thread goes cold
- 20% faster cycle times and 15% higher win rates
Book a demo to see how Yess.ai helps sales teams multi-thread accounts and close more deals.
About the Author
Jonathan Bregman is the founder of Yess.ai and a former enterprise sales leader with 10+ years of experience closing complex B2B deals. He's helped hundreds of sales teams implement multi-threading strategies that accelerate deal velocity and increase win rates.